#March networks dvr player install#
#March networks dvr player Pc#

Internal Static CCTV surveillance Camera.

Grandeye Halocam R CCTV surveillance camera.

External/Internal Static Colour Dome CCTV Surveillance Camera.

Dual Chip (Day/Night) Static Dome CCTV surveillance camera.

Dual Chip (Day/Night) Static CCTV Surveillance Camera.

360 Vision Technology – Vison Matrix and Keyboard.

Cieffe Spectiva RT & RTL – Digital Audio/Video Recording Management System.

Cieffe Linearis RM – Digital Video Management System.

Cieffe Linearis Net – Digital Video Management System.

Cieffe Linearis LE – Digital Video Recorder.

Bosch Video Jet X10/X20/X40 Video Encoder.

Bosch Video Jet X10/X20/X40 SN Video Encoder.

Bosch Dinion XF IP Dual Chip Static Camera.

360 Vision Technology Vandal Resistant IP Mini Dome.

The player includes an Authentication function that will tell you within seconds if the video has been tampered with or damaged at all.

#March networks dvr player install#

The Vigils do that, no batch required: they put their player/codec installer on the disc with an autorun, so when you pop it in (at least on a Windows machine), it launches, checks if the player and codec already exist on the machine, starts the install if they're not, and just loads the video if they area.

#March networks dvr player Pc#

But I had not thought of the processing power that might be needed when you are running 16 cameras in the background.ĭont quote me but I am pretty sure some of the Sanyo recorders export in MPEG2 - but is this in a format that can autorun in a standard DVD player - I doubt it - a LOT of newer systems will copy an autorun file onto the DVD as well as their video, IE once you pop the DVD you burned into another pc it will auto detect the codec and if not there it will install it - this could even be made as a simple batch file really - we do this with some of the March Networks DVR's we sell - in this way the codec gets loaded in the background so they have no issue - but I do see your point - the issue is that unless your a casino you dont want to have MPEG2 as the native format as it is too large - so that means transcoding it and that takes a lot of resource to do So I still think DVD is really handy to have. Jones to make it look like her that shoplifted the pack of cigarettes. But even if you didn’t have the original, it is hard to imaging a jury is going to believe that Walmart hired expert video editors to colon in Ms. Just mentioning the fact that you have the original would kill any serious request for it. If there does arise a dispute, you can always go back to the original, assuming you exported that as well. Our prosecutor wants things in DVD so that everyone, including the defense, can view it. I suppose there could be a long covert op sometime, but it seems like everything I get to do is not very long. Of course after the export, it doesn't do anything to make it into a burnable DVD video.Īs to the length issue, most of what we have been dealing with here has been shop lifting incidences, traffic stops, gasoline drive offs, and occasional armed robbery. I'll have to check and see how long it takes to do so. In actuality, I have an Aver System demo running in my office that does export to Mpeg2. The conversion will probably go a lot faster anyway. Rather than exporting video in AVI, it's usually better to export in the DVR's own format, then convert that later as necessary. Most DVRs I've seen that will export AVI, have to convert the video on-the-fly, and it takes FAR longer than exporting directly to their native format, and also takes a lot more space. Again, a playable DVD-Video might be handy for courtroom playback, but you'd still need a native version that can be authenticated. Once you convert to a different format, you lose that proof. Three, most DVRs embed timecode and other authentication data in their native video, which allows users (lawyers, police, court officers) to prove that the video hasn't been edited or tampered with.

That may be fine for short clips for use in court, but I often see the police wanting half-a-day's output of several or all cameras, which would require multiple DVDs. For example, DVR-specific file formats allow proper playback of video recorded at lower framerates, while transcoding for DVD-Video playback requires converting to 30fps (well, 29.97fps for NTSC drop-frame video), which in itself greatly increases the storage space needed. Two, it's not nearly as space-efficient as the codecs typically used for CCTV - at lowest quality, a 4.7GB DVD will hold about 6 hours video, while a data DVD will allow you to put several hours' worth of several cameras. which can be a long and CPU-intensive process, which is not something you'd normally want to do ON your DVR. One, the video has to be converted/transcoded to MPEG-2 for that. I know of none, but I can think of a few drawbacks to it.